CO48/127 National Archives, Kew, London  ~   Selected Settler Correspondence for 1828

 

Transcribed by volunteers from the ZA-IB and ZA-EC Rootsweb mailing lists from digital photographs taken by Sue Mackay at the National Archives. The original correspondence is filed in order of receipt. Here it has been placed in alphabetical order according to the surname of the writer, with letters by the same writer in chronological order, for ease of reading. Original spelling has been maintained.

 

Letters, unless otherwise indicated, were either addressed to the Rt Hon William HUSKISSON (prior  to 30th May) or the Rt. Hon. Sir George MURRAY, Secretary of State for the Colonies, or to his deputy R.W. HAY. Reference numbers, where given, refer to printed page numbers stamped on the letters and will enable visitors to the National Archives to locate the letter more easily.

 

CAMPBELL, Mary (see correspondence in 1829 and also of Charles CAMPBELL in 1827)

 

209

12 Judd Street, Brunswick Square

27th December 1828                                                                  

Sir

            I appeal to you as Secretary of State for the Colonies and who as a military Officer of [rank?] to redress the grievances of an unfortunate family, the children of a deceased Officer who are reduced by the circumstances I am about to relate to poverty and great distress.

The late Major General CAMPBELL their Father received a considerable grant of Land 10,000 acres from the then Secretary of State for the Colonies at the new Settlement at the Cape of Good Hope and from the flattering description given of that place at the time as well as from the extent of the grant he was induced to embark a considerable sum of money in transporting himself and a part of his family with work people of different descriptions, agricultural implements, materials for buildings, vines from Portugal plants and seeds of different kinds with sundry &c hoping in a few years by activity and attention to secure a comfortable independence for his numerous family of 13 Children. An accident however produced by over exertion put a period to his life and deprived his Children of their Protector. This lamentable event was the fore runner and the cause of other misfortunes.

The Land after a location of 3 years was taken from them and they had the grief and mortification to see distributed to others the Land that had cost their Father the Sacrifice of his Country and friends and eventually of his life. The Widow indeed had a portion of it given to her but independent of her own four children, very young, as well as the nine by a former marriage. Since the Pension has been withdrawn of £18 per year which ceases by the new regulation at the age of 18 they have been without pecuniary or other resource.

Such is the situation of the Children of an old officer; the Eldest Son at the Cape now twenty years or nearly so was noted by the Command of His Royal Highness the late Duke of York for a Commission but has not yet been appointed, nor are there any hopes held out that he will be so for a considerable time. The small sum of money that he is entitled to from the sale of his Father’s personal property is in the hands of the Orphan Chamber who are entitled to hold it ‘till the age of 26 years. He is a lad of good talents, writes well, and has considerable local knowledge of the Country he is in and speaks the language, which would make him eligible as well as useful either in the Military line / a Cape Regiment / or in a civil capacity - Something I trust will be done for him – and if possible for his Brother also – and a portion of the Land restored to the family generally. ___ In making a representation of this case I do not address myself only to the Secretary of State for the Colonies but to a Gentleman of the same Profession as their deceased Father – whose humanity as well as feeling for the Orphan Children of a Brother Officer will lead him to give them his assistance either in the way pointed out or in any other he may think better suited to this case.

I have the Honor to be Sir

With high respect

Your most Obedient Servant

Mary CAMPBELL

 

CARLISLE, Frederick (see also 1825, 1826 and 1827 correspondence)

 

193

Brentwood, Essex

27th Feb 1828

Sir

            I had the honor to receive from you a communication dated in December last, stating in reference to my application on behalf of the Albany Settlers, that there were no funds which could be applied to their relief. Being anxious to acquaint the Settlers with the result of my expedition to this Country, may I beg to be forward with a reply of a more particular nature, that is, one adverting to the original application submitted by me on the part of the Albany Settlers and the kind of relief therein prayed for.

            As I am now writing (with your concurrence) merely on a matter of form and not with any view to induce the reconsideration of a question unfortunately decided against me, I will briefly state the points to which I wish allusion to be made –

            A memorial dated 20th April 1825 from the principle Agriculturist Settlers in Albany, praying H. M. Government to afford them the means of conveyance from England for a number of labourers of which they were in great want, stating also that their circumstances were too much reduced to enable them to effect this desirable object by their own private exertions – and further praying that to the before-named grant, might be added, the amount of expense incurred by the individual (myself) to conduct the Emigration.

            I have the honor to be Sir, your very obedt. & humbl. Servant

            Fred CARLISLE

 

CARLISLE. William (See also correspondence for 1829)

 

195

Brentwood

March 14th 1828

Sir,

Having been honoured with the appointment of Chaplain of Grahams Town at the Cape of Good Hope for which place I intend to embark at the end of the present month I am induced most respectfully to solicit the indulgence of a free passage and humbly hope that out of consideration of the many expences incident to a preparation for a residence in a distant country, my request my not be deemed unreasonable by the Rt. Honble. The Sect. Of State.

I have the honour to be sir

Your most obedt. Humb’l Servt.

William CARLISLE

 

PHILIPPS, Thomas

 

374

Glendour District of Albany

Cape of Good Hope

5th March 1828

 

Sir

In the month of December 1826 a Memorial signed by a numerous Body of English Settlers & others, resident in this district, was forwarded to His Honor Major General BOURKE, Lieut. Governor of this Colony, humbly praying for the reasons therein stated, that he would be pleased to repeal the Proclamation prohibiting the distillation of Spirits from Grain.

            From the reply which was returned to the Memorialists it appeared that His Honor judged proper to refer it to the Honorable Council, and it was therein that the Members did not think themselves justified in recommending the repeal of Proclamation of such long standing as of the year 1798 without the concurrence of His Majesty’s Minister for the Colonies.

            The Memorialists having waited twelve months without any further communication & pressure on the Growers of Barley & Oats having increased, in consequence of the diminished demand owing to the disbanding of part of the Cape cavalry, a letter was addressed to the Honorable Col. BELL, Acting Secretary to Government, with a request to be informed if any orders had been received from England, but as from the reply it appears that no communication had been as yet received, it is humbly hoped that you will not think it an improper interference on my part, considering the urgency of this, in venturing to address you, direct, on the subject.

            Before I proceed I must beg leave explicitly to declare [that] no unfavorable impression has arisen with regard to the delay & that it has been attributed to no other cause than to the [changes] which have taken place in the Department over which you have been so lately appointed to preside.

            As all the papers connected with this affair will of course be in your office, I shall only intrude with one observation, namely that a copy of the prohibitory proclamation not having been obtained until after the Memorial was forwarded The Memorialists were precluded from offering any comments on it, I will now briefly observe that it is dated in the year 1798 & that the cause of its being issued is alleged to be owing to the scarcity of Corn which existed at the period. Since the year 1798 the circumstances of the Colony have materially changed. The four Frontier Districts & those which are most affected by the prohibition, now so populous, were not all formed & scarcely inhabited. The proclamation may therefore fairly be inferred as only embracing the then state of the five Western [sic]

            The inhabitants of the new Territory have with slight exception employed themselves in grazing & the growth of Corn, leaving the cultivation of the Vine to the western inhabitants being more fortunately situated for the exportation of their wines & Spirit enjoyed advantages which were denied to them.

            In proportion as the Colony extended eastward the distance from Cape Town, the only export Place, became of course increased & in the same ratio the expenses on such ? articles as wines + spirits became increased. Graham’s Town, the capital of Albany & in size become the second Town of the Colony, is 600 miles from Cape Town it is forced to draw all its supplies of this nature, owing to the prohibition in question, from thence, by which the price to the consumer is enhanced above cent per cent for ? price of Cape Brandy is retailed there at 1’/6 per gallon whilst at this extremity it cannot be afforded at less than 3/9. It is computed that the value of these articles expended in this District alone amongst the Inhabitants & Military exceeds 15.000, a great proportion of which may be considered as an unnecessary drain for if Distillation from Grain was allowed, the inhabitants could supply within themselves a much cheaper & what is of more consequence much wholesomer liquor.                                                   

            Having pointed out the heavy pressure on the Eastern Inhabitants being thus forced to take all their supplies from the Western, I will proceed to notice the alleged cause of the prohibition, namely the scarcity of Corn. It will not be attempted to be denied that the cause was justifiable, & further that the same cause might have continued to a later period. The industry of the British Settlers has however put a period to any further apprehension of any scarcity of Barley & Oats which are the only grain prayed for to be used in distillation. The contract for the delivery for the next 9 months [with] Cavalry has just been concluded, still a surplus remains for which there is no market altho procurable at about 2/- the Winchester Bushel, from the want of Harbor exportation is rendered impossible, the agriculturists must rely entirely on internal consumption & except they are permitted to make every use of their Produce, their fields which they have tilled with much littler profit for 7 years must be again allowed to resume their former wilderness.

            I hope I shall not be considered as having trespassed too much on your time, by thus dwelling on a subject of much moment to those around me, both Growers and Consumers, and will conclude with expressing my fervent expectation that this question will be met with the same liberal spirit which now governs our native Country & that the period has passed away when by monopolies or Influence, the interests of one part of the same People are allowed to be sacrificed [to] those of another.

I have the Honor to remain, Sir

Your obedient and humble servant

Thomas PHILIPPS

 

PIKE, John

 

376

The humble Petition of Thomas PIKE and John PIKE brothers of William PIKE, Settler at the Cape of Good Hope,

Sheweth, That we your Petitioners, most humbly request you will please if Practicable, to grant us the indulgence, to have a conveyance from this our Native country, to the Cape of Good Hope to our Brother, and to our Families, consisting of 17 Persons who are all desirous to go.  We your Petitioners begs further to state for your information we have been since our youth in the practice of Cultivation in the farming line and our Sons also have been in that capacity and are all stout and healthy; as also our wives who are as desirous to go as ourselves.

Providing we can be granted the indulgence We beg to add we conceive there will be 3 of us capable to work our Passage if there can be any provision made for the remainder, if not we shall humbly acknowledge, and attend to your answer – trusting you will be pleased to inform us the [total] amount of the Passage expences.

Hoping the result of Your Honors answer being favorable, we shall as in duty bound ever fervently pray.

Which is Submitted by

Your Honor’s most humble Petitioners

John & Thomas PIKE

Nottingham 12th May 1828

N.B. Please to address

John PIKE

Post Office Nottingham

Till called for

 

P.S.  If it would be more agreeable to convey a larger number here is several other families wishes to go.

 

377

Copy

Downing Street

15 May 1828

John PIKE

Mr Secy HUSKISSON desires me to acquaint you in answer to your Memorial of the 12th instant that H.M’s Govt. do not grant passages to persons desirous of proceeding to the Cape of Good Hope.

Sender: J. LEVESON GOWER

 

378

Holme Pierepponte

2nd June 1828

Sir,

            I applied on the 12th Ulto. for information what the freight would be for myself and family, as well as my Brother and his family; if not probable to go free and I have received an answer that there is no provision at present for a passage for Settlers (nr. Bathurst). I now beg you will please to inform me what will be the least expence for myself and Brother Wives and children consisting of seventeen souls to go to that part of the Globe. I have a brother a Settler in that part of the world who has sent for us shall it meet the approbation of Lord Bathurst to grant the indulgence to join him with as little delay as possible.

Shall you Sir please to favor me with an answer on the subject as speedily as convenient, it will be greatfully acknowleged and my Brother, who is there will pay £20-0-0 and £20-0-0 we can advance between [us and] if that will not be a sufficient sum we [will] endeavour on receiving your answer to make up the amount being resolved to go.

I am, Sir

Your very Obed’t. Serv’t.

John PIKE

Post Office

Nottingham

Till Called For

 

PRINGLE, Thomas

 

383

18 Aldermanbury

July 7 1828

Sir,

            In taking the liberty to transmit to you the little volume which accompanies this I beg to state my object is to interest your attention in regard to the treatment and pursuant condition of the aboriginal tribes of Southern Africa – respecting whom you will find some cursory notices in the prose notes at the end of the volume.

            On this subject and also with regard to some matters connected with the appointment of the clergyman to the Scottish settlers at Baviaans River who emigrated in 1820 under my direction, I am anxious to converse with you if you can conveniently indulge me with the privilege of a quarter of an hour  on any early day.  You are probably aware that the Mr.Fowell BUXTON is to bring the situation of the Hottentot population into the notice of parliament Tuesday next.

I have the honour to be your most obedient servant

Thomas PR INGLE

 

385

London 18 Aldermanbury

July 26 1828

Sir, 

The Rev W PEARS, the gentleman recently appointed minister of the Scotch Church at Baviaans River, Cape of Good Hope, in a letter which I have just received from him, requests me to state to you that the sudden death of a sister who was to have accompanied him to South Africa, and to whom he was extremely attached, has affected his feelings and disconcerted his arrangements, that it will not be possible for him, without extreme inconvenience, to embark before the 1st week of October. He therefore, most respectfully & earnestly requests that you will, if possible, so order matters in regard to his proposition that he may not be required to embark before the period I have mentioned.  By that period he will be away without fail.

Permit me to solicit your obliging attention to his request (which I am well aware is not proffered without urgent cause) & by the favour of an early reply in order to set Rev PEARS’ mind at rest on the subject.

I have the honour to be your most obedient servant

Thomas PRINGLE

 

[Colonial office note across corner for reply: Acq’t the Navy Board with the time when a Passage for Mr. PEARS will be wanted & let Mr. PRINGLE be informed that his application will be attended to]

 

387

18 Aldermanbury

Sept 13 1828

Sir,

I have received a letter from the Rev W PEARS requesting to be informed as precisely as may be practicable of the time when it will be necessary for him to be in London in order to embark in the vessel where government has provided him a passage. He understands of course, from your last letter which has been transmitted to him, that he is to embark in the course of October, and noted himself in readiness to appear here whenever I inform him of the vessel being in readiness but is unwilling to leave his relatives sooner than may be requisite.

            I feel reluctant to trouble you with such small matters but know of no other way of obtaining the information Rev PEARS desires.  Perhaps you will be so obliging as direct one of your clerks to make the requisite inquiring about the probable period of the vessel sailing in which  passage  has been engaged for him – and to write a short note communicating this information, the name of the vessel and the Master or agent.

I have the honour to be your most obedient servant

Thomas PRINGLE